Skip to content
Questioning the source of Luke’s writings

Questioning the source of Luke’s writings

Who really inspired the "text"

8 min read
Additional
Ahmad Deedat - South African-Indian Muslim missionary (South African-Indian Muslim missionary)
View transcriptions
  [Deedat] 
  Let us hear
  this Christian young man Hanskung.
  Hanskung
  he's written a book called infallible
  question mark.
  Author of being Christian
  he says who is this man Hanskung I don't
  know whether I'm pronouncing it
  correctly.
  Please forgive me. You know
  the Scandinavian language is a bit
  difficult on my tongue.
  The 43-year-old Swissborn
  Swissborn professor of dogmatic and
  ecumenical theology and director of the
  Institute of Ecumenical Studies at
  Tubingan University in West Germany was
  one of the select group of official
  theologians appointed during the Vatican
  2 council by Pope John himself.
  known as the young proteé of modern
  theology and consequently may not be
  interpreted.
  Uh he says now nowhere do
  the books he says nowhere do the books
  of the new testament claim to have
  fallen directly from heaven.
  Nowhere.
  This is what our friend Hanskung says.
  On the contrary, often enough, they
  quite candidly emphasize quite candidly,
  honestly, they emphasize
  the human origin.
  Luke chapter 1 verses 1 and two is
  especially revealing on the origin of
  the gospels.
  Especially revealing.
  What does it say? Luke 1:es 1 and 2.
  Luke tells us, he doesn't talk about him
  being tickled by the Holy Ghost or by
  the Holy Spirit to write his words.
  He says here, verse two, just as those who
  from the beginning were eyewitnesses and
  ministers of the word delivered them to
  us, it seemed good to me also.
  If every Tom, Dick, and Harry people
  less educated myself than myself, if
  they can write volumes, me a physician,
  one of the most learned of the followers
  of Christianity at the time, why can't I
  do a better job?
  This is his inspiration. The others, you
  can do it. You can do it. Why can't I?
  I'm more learner than you. So he says,
  "It seemed good to me also, having had
  perfect understanding of all things from
  the very first to write to you an
  orderly account, most excellent
  Theophilus."
  The only thing he claims is
  that the other writings are not orderly.
  Mine will be an orderly account. Mark is
  jumping here, there, and everywhere.
  Mine won't be like that. Mine will be an
  orderly book.
  That is he does not claim
  to be inspired by God or by the Holy
  Ghost or by the Holy Spirit.
  His inspiration is the people that went
  before him who had done the job.
  And in this book of Luke
  chapter 3 verse 23
  we have the genealogy of Jesus.
  It reads, "And Jesus
  happened to be about
  30 years of age when he began to preach
  who being
  in brackets in brackets as was supposed
  the son of Joseph in brackets.
  Now what's all this? Number one, if the
  spirit of God is inspiring Luke to write
  that,
  this spirit of God didn't know how old
  Jesus was.
  Can you imagine this spirit of God
  supposed to be God? The Christian
  believes, the Pentecostals believe that
  the father is God, the son is God, and
  the Holy Ghost is God. But there are not
  three gods but one God.
  The Holy Ghost
  is God, the spirit of God is God.
  But this God, if he inspired Luke, this God
  didn't know how old Jesus was.
  So he's saying about 30 years. God
  doesn't know how old Jesus was when he
  began is about 30 about.
  He's not sure
  when he began to preach. Now in the
  latest translation, the word when he
  began to preach is taken out.
  You know
  why? The question arises, God Almighty
  waited for billions of years before
  coming down to earth.
  And from the age
  from day one to the age of 30, he didn't
  deliver one sentence for the benefit of
  mankind.
  What was he doing for 30 years?
  What did he do? One sentence to help
  mankind.
  He did nothing.
  Not one word, not one sentence.
  So when he began to preach for 30 years,
  he did nothing.
  So they took the word
  when he began to preaches out or the
  modern translation of the King James
  version the word is taken out and as was
  supposed are in brackets
  meaning Luke
  Luke didn't write those words ask any
  Christian scholar any Christian scholar
  what the name these words in brackets
  what do they mean what do they imply and
  they will honestly confess that it means
  that in the original manuscripts these
  words were not there as was supposed was
  not there.
  These are the words of the
  editors trying to help the reader. They
  have a right.
  They have a right. In the Quranic
  translation, we find the same.
  The translator, he puts words in brackets,
  meaning he's trying to convey to us that
  look, the words are not there, but this
  is what is implied.
  He's trying to help
  you. This help is appreciated
  in the Bible also appreciated.
  But now you see they can mint the word
  of man is the word of man.
  Now if Luke
  was inspired then those words in
  brackets are not inspired.
  But what they have done now in the
  Swedish Bible and the Danish Bible I
  check them up.
  The words are there
  as was supposed are still there but the
  brackets are thrown out.
  You know now what it means
  once the brackets are thrown out it
  becomes the words of Luke and if Luke
  was inspired they become the word of
  God.
  So the Christians are minting God's
  word at their own leisure anytime they
  want to.
  They can put words in, put it
  in brackets. Honest, very honest.
  And then take the brackets out in every
  translation other than in English, in
  the vernacular, in Zulu, Africans, in
  Udu, in Swedish, in in Norwegian, in
  every language of the world world other
  than English.
  The words are retained in
  the brackets thrown out. Maybe the
  Scandinavians don't know what brackets
  mean.
  [B] 
  And it's very true that we do not
  believe in a verbal dictation.
  We
  believe in a complete total inspiration.