Deep learning

Before 1980

There are two types of artificial neural network (ANN): feedforward neural network (FNN) or multilayer perceptron (MLP) and recurrent neural networks (RNN). RNNs have cycles in their connectivity structure, whereas FNNs do not. In the 1920s, Wilhelm Lenz and Ernst Ising created the Ising model^[29][30] which is essentially a non-learning RNN architecture consisting of neuron-like threshold elements. In 1972, Shun'ichi Amari made this architecture adaptive.^[31][32] His learning RNN was republished by John Hopfield in 1982.^[33] Other early recurrent neural networks were published by Kaoru Nakano in 1971.^[34][35] Already in 1948, Alan Turing produced work on "Intelligent Machinery" that was not published in his lifetime,^[36] containing "ideas related to artificial evolution and learning RNNs".^[32]

Frank Rosenblatt (1958)^[37] proposed the perceptron, an MLP with 3 layers: an input layer, a hidden layer with randomized weights that did not learn, and an output layer. He later published a 1962 book that also introduced variants and computer experiments, including a version with four-layer perceptrons "with adaptive preterminal networks" where the last two layers have learned weights (here he credits H. D. Block and B. W. Knight).^{[38]: section 16} The book cites an earlier network by R. D. Joseph (1960)^[39] "functionally equivalent to a variation of" this four-layer system (the book mentions Joseph over 30 times). Should Joseph therefore be considered the originator of proper adaptive multilayer perceptrons with learning hidden units? Unfortunately, the learning algorithm was not a functional one, and fell into oblivion.

The first working deep learning algorithm was the Group method of data handling, a method to train arbitrarily deep neural networks, published by Alexey Ivakhnenko and Lapa in 1965. They regarded it as a form of polynomial regression,^[40] or a generalization of Rosenblatt's perceptron to handle more complex, nonlinear, and hierarchical relationships.^[41] A 1971 paper described a deep network with eight layers trained by this method,^[42] which is based on layer by layer training through regression analysis. Superfluous hidden units are pruned using a separate validation set. Since the activation functions of the nodes are Kolmogorov-Gabor polynomials, these were also the first deep networks with multiplicative units or "gates".^[32]

The first deep learning multilayer perceptron trained by stochastic gradient descent^[43] was published in 1967 by Shun'ichi Amari.^[44] In computer experiments conducted by Amari's student Saito, a five layer MLP with two modifiable layers learned internal representations to classify non-linearily separable pattern classes.^[32] Subsequent developments in hardware and hyperparameter tunings have made end-to-end stochastic gradient descent the currently dominant training technique.

In 1969, Kunihiko Fukushima introduced the ReLU (rectified linear unit) activation function.^[25][32] The rectifier has become the most popular activation function for deep learning.^[45]

Deep learning architectures for convolutional neural networks (CNNs) with convolutional layers and downsampling layers began with the Neocognitron introduced by Kunihiko Fukushima in 1979, though not trained by backpropagation.^[46][47]

Backpropagation is an efficient application of the chain rule to networks of differentiable nodes. The terminology "back-propagating errors" was actually introduced in 1962 by Rosenblatt,^[38] but he did not know how to implement this, although Henry J. Kelley had a continuous precursor of backpropagation in 1960 in the context of control theory.^[48] The modern form of backpropagation was first published in Seppo Linnainmaa's master thesis (1970).^[49][50][32] G.M. Ostrovski et al. republished it in 1971.^[51][52] Paul Werbos applied backpropagation to neural networks in 1982^[53] (his 1974 PhD thesis, reprinted in a 1994 book,^[54] did not yet describe the algorithm^[52]). In 1986, David E. Rumelhart et al. popularised backpropagation but did not cite the original work.^[55][56]

1980s-2000s

The time delay neural network (TDNN) was introduced in 1987 by Alex Waibel to apply CNN to phoneme recognition. It used convolutions, weight sharing, and backpropagation.^[57][58] In 1988, Wei Zhang applied a backpropagation-trained CNN to alphabet recognition.^[59] In 1989, Yann LeCun et al. created a CNN called LeNet for recognizing handwritten ZIP codes on mail. Training required 3 days.^[60] In 1990, Wei Zhang implemented a CNN on optical computing hardware.^[61] In 1991, a CNN was applied to medical image object segmentation^[62] and breast cancer detection in mammograms.^[63] LeNet-5 (1998), a 7-level CNN by Yann LeCun et al., that classifies digits, was applied by several banks to recognize hand-written numbers on checks digitized in 32x32 pixel images.^[64]

Recurrent neural networks (RNN)^[29][31] were further developed in the 1980s. Recurrence is used for sequence processing, and when a recurrent network is unrolled, it mathematically resembles a deep feedforward layer. Consequently, they have similar properties and issues, and their developments had mutual influences. In RNN, two early influential works were the Jordan network (1986)^[65], the Elman network (1990),^[66] which applied RNN to study problems in cognitive psychology.

The recurrent Random neural network introduced by Erol Gelenbe (1989) was inspired by the stochastic spiking behaviour of mammalian brain neurons, and ^{[67] [68]}. It was proved to have a convergent stable state that allowed the development of a simple deep learning gradient algorithm for this recurrent network ^[69]. It has had numerous applications, including for brain tumor detection from MR images using texture-based segmentation ^[70] and real-time video compression ^[71]. Gelenbe also developed its reinforcement learning algorithm, allowing the Random neural network to be used effectively for packet network routing that is interoperable and compatible with the existing Internet protocol ^{[72] [73]}. In recent years, new developments of the Random neural network that have large and dense clusters of recurrent neurons with Deep Learning, have resulted in highly accurate algorithms for cyberattack detection and mitigation ^{[74] [75]}, as well as for the real-time control of smart homes.

In the 1980s, backpropagation did not work well for deep learning with long credit assignment paths. To overcome this problem, in 1991, Jürgen Schmidhuber proposed a hierarchy of RNNs pre-trained one level at a time by self-supervised learning where each RNN tries to predict its own next input, which is the next unexpected input of the RNN below.^[76][77] This "neural history compressor" uses predictive coding to learn internal representations at multiple self-organizing time scales. This can substantially facilitate downstream deep learning. The RNN hierarchy can be collapsed into a single RNN, by distilling a higher level chunker network into a lower level automatizer network.^[76][77][32] In 1993, a neural history compressor solved a "Very Deep Learning" task that required more than 1000 subsequent layers in an RNN unfolded in time.^[78] The "P" in ChatGPT refers to such pre-training.

Sepp Hochreiter's diploma thesis (1991)^[79] implemented the neural history compressor,^[76] and identified and analyzed the vanishing gradient problem.^[79][80] Hochreiter proposed recurrent residual connections to solve the vanishing gradient problem. This led to the long short-term memory (LSTM), published in 1995.^[81] LSTM can learn "very deep learning" tasks^[9] with long credit assignment paths that require memories of events that happened thousands of discrete time steps before. That LSTM was not yet the modern architecture, which required a "forget gate", introduced in 1999,^[82] which became the standard RNN architecture.

In 1991, Jürgen Schmidhuber also published adversarial neural networks that contest with each other in the form of a zero-sum game, where one network's gain is the other network's loss.^[83][84] The first network is a generative model that models a probability distribution over output patterns. The second network learns by gradient descent to predict the reactions of the environment to these patterns. This was called "artificial curiosity". In 2014, this principle was used in generative adversarial networks (GANs).^[85]

During 1985–1995, inspired by statistical mechanics, several architectures and methods were developed by Terry Sejnowski, Peter Dayan, Geoffrey Hinton, etc., including the Boltzmann machine,^[86] restricted Boltzmann machine,^[87] Helmholtz machine,^[88] and the wake-sleep algorithm.^[89] These were designed for unsupervised learning of deep generative models. However, those were more computationally expensive compared to backpropagation. Boltzmann machine learning algorithm, published in 1985, was briefly popular before being eclipsed by the backpropagation algorithm in 1986. (p. 112 ^[90]). A 1988 network became state of the art in protein structure prediction, an early application of deep learning to bioinformatics.^[91]

Both shallow and deep learning (e.g., recurrent nets) of ANNs for speech recognition have been explored for many years.^[92][93][94] These methods never outperformed non-uniform internal-handcrafting Gaussian mixture model/Hidden Markov model (GMM-HMM) technology based on generative models of speech trained discriminatively.^[95] Key difficulties have been analyzed, including gradient diminishing^[79] and weak temporal correlation structure in neural predictive models.^[96][97] Additional difficulties were the lack of training data and limited computing power.

Most speech recognition researchers moved away from neural nets to pursue generative modeling. An exception was at SRI International in the late 1990s. Funded by the US government's NSA and DARPA, SRI researched in speech and speaker recognition. The speaker recognition team led by Larry Heck reported significant success with deep neural networks in speech processing in the 1998 NIST Speaker Recognition benchmark.^[98][99] It was deployed in the Nuance Verifier, representing the first major industrial application of deep learning.^[100]

The principle of elevating "raw" features over hand-crafted optimization was first explored successfully in the architecture of deep autoencoder on the "raw" spectrogram or linear filter-bank features in the late 1990s,^[99] showing its superiority over the Mel-Cepstral features that contain stages of fixed transformation from spectrograms. The raw features of speech, waveforms, later produced excellent larger-scale results.^[101]

2000s

Neural networks entered a lull, and simpler models that use task-specific handcrafted features such as Gabor filters and support vector machines (SVMs) became the preferred choices in the 1990s and 2000s, because of artificial neural networks' computational cost and a lack of understanding of how the brain wires its biological networks.^{[citation needed]}

In 2003, LSTM became competitive with traditional speech recognizers on certain tasks.^[102] In 2006, Alex Graves, Santiago Fernández, Faustino Gomez, and Schmidhuber combined it with connectionist temporal classification (CTC)^[103] in stacks of LSTMs.^[104] In 2009, it became the first RNN to win a pattern recognition contest, in connected handwriting recognition.^[105][9]

In 2006, publications by Geoff Hinton, Ruslan Salakhutdinov, Osindero and Teh^[106][107] deep belief networks were developed for generative modeling. They are trained by training one restricted Boltzmann machine, then freezing it and training another one on top of the first one, and so on, then optionally fine-tuned using supervised backpropagation.^[106] They could model high-dimensional probability distributions, such as the distribution of MNIST images, but convergence was slow.^{[106][108][109]}

The impact of deep learning in industry began in the early 2000s, when CNNs already processed an estimated 10% to 20% of all the checks written in the US, according to Yann LeCun.^[110] Industrial applications of deep learning to large-scale speech recognition started around 2010.

The 2009 NIPS Workshop on Deep Learning for Speech Recognition was motivated by the limitations of deep generative models of speech, and the possibility that given more capable hardware and large-scale data sets that deep neural nets might become practical. It was believed that pre-training DNNs using generative models of deep belief nets (DBN) would overcome the main difficulties of neural nets. However, it was discovered that replacing pre-training with large amounts of training data for straightforward backpropagation when using DNNs with large, context-dependent output layers produced error rates dramatically lower than then-state-of-the-art Gaussian mixture model (GMM)/Hidden Markov Model (HMM) and also than more-advanced generative model-based systems.^[111] The nature of the recognition errors produced by the two types of systems was characteristically different,^[112] offering technical insights into how to integrate deep learning into the existing highly efficient, run-time speech decoding system deployed by all major speech recognition systems.^{[23][113][114]} Analysis around 2009–2010, contrasting the GMM (and other generative speech models) vs. DNN models, stimulated early industrial investment in deep learning for speech recognition.^[112] That analysis was done with comparable performance (less than 1.5% in error rate) between discriminative DNNs and generative models.^{[111][112][115]} In 2010, researchers extended deep learning from TIMIT to large vocabulary speech recognition, by adopting large output layers of the DNN based on context-dependent HMM states constructed by decision trees.^{[116][117][118][113]}

Deep learning revolution

The period of significant growth in both the adoption and performance of deep learning in the 2010s was driven by the emergence of efficient implementations of CNNs on GPU hardware.

Although CNNs trained by backpropagation had been around for decades and GPU implementations of NNs for years,^[119] including CNNs,^[120] faster implementations of CNNs on GPUs were needed to progress on computer vision. Later, as deep learning becomes widespread, specialized hardware and algorithm optimizations were developed specifically for deep learning.^[121]

A key advance for the deep learning revolution was hardware advances, especially GPU. Some early work dated back to 2004.^[119][120] In 2009, Raina, Madhavan, and Andrew Ng reported a 100M deep belief network trained on 30 Nvidia GeForce GTX 280 GPUs, an early demonstration of GPU-based deep learning. They reported up to 70 times faster training.^[122]

In 2011, a CNN named DanNet^[123][124] by Dan Ciresan, Ueli Meier, Jonathan Masci, Luca Maria Gambardella, and Jürgen Schmidhuber achieved for the first time superhuman performance in a visual pattern recognition contest, outperforming traditional methods by a factor of 3.^[9] It then won more contests.^[125][126] They also showed how max-pooling CNNs on GPU improved performance significantly.^[3]

In 2012, Andrew Ng and Jeff Dean created an FNN that learned to recognize higher-level concepts, such as cats, only from watching unlabeled images taken from YouTube videos.^[127]

In October 2012, AlexNet by Alex Krizhevsky, Ilya Sutskever, and Geoffrey Hinton^[4] won the large-scale ImageNet competition by a significant margin over shallow machine learning methods. Further incremental improvements included the VGG-16 network by Karen Simonyan and Andrew Zisserman^[128] and Google's Inceptionv3.^[129]

In 2013, Tomáš Mikolov and colleagues developed word2vec, a method for efficiently learning word embeddings from large text corpora.^[130] The resulting vector representations were shown to capture syntactic and semantic relationships between words. A subsequent paper introduced negative sampling as an efficient method for training such models.^[131]

The success in image classification was then extended to the more challenging task of generating descriptions (captions) for images, often as a combination of CNNs and LSTMs.^{[132][133][134]}

In 2014, the state of the art was training a "very deep neural network" with 20 to 30 layers.^[135] Stacking too many layers led to a steep reduction in training accuracy,^[136] known as the "degradation" problem.^[137] In 2015, two techniques were developed to train very deep networks: the highway network was published in May 2015, and the residual neural network (ResNet)^[137] in Dec 2015. ResNet behaves like an open-gated Highway Net.

Around the same time, deep learning started impacting the field of art. Early examples included Google DeepDream (2015), and neural style transfer (2015),^[138] both of which were based on pretrained image classification neural networks, such as VGG-19.

Generative adversarial network (GAN) by (Ian Goodfellow et al., 2014)^[139] (based on Jürgen Schmidhuber's principle of artificial curiosity^[83][85]) became state of the art in generative modeling during 2014-2018 period. Excellent image quality is achieved by Nvidia's StyleGAN (2018)^[140] based on the Progressive GAN by Tero Karras et al.^[141] Here the GAN generator is grown from small to large scale in a pyramidal fashion. Image generation by GAN reached popular success, and provoked discussions concerning deepfakes.^[142] Diffusion models (2015)^[143] eclipsed GANs in generative modeling since then, with systems such as DALL·E 2 (2022) and Stable Diffusion (2022).

In 2015, Google's speech recognition improved by 49% by an LSTM-based model, which they made available through Google Voice Search on smartphone.^[144][145]

Deep learning is part of state-of-the-art systems in various disciplines, particularly computer vision and automatic speech recognition (ASR). Results on commonly used evaluation sets such as TIMIT (ASR) and MNIST (image classification), as well as a range of large-vocabulary speech recognition tasks have steadily improved.^[111][146] Convolutional neural networks were superseded for ASR by LSTM.^{[145][147][148][149]} but are more successful in computer vision.

Yoshua Bengio, Geoffrey Hinton and Yann LeCun were awarded the 2018 Turing Award for "conceptual and engineering breakthroughs that have made deep neural networks a critical component of computing".^[150]

Deep neural networks

A deep neural network (DNN) is an artificial neural network with multiple layers between the input and output layers.^[7][9] There are different types of neural networks but they always consist of the same components: neurons, synapses, weights, biases, and functions.^[153] These components as a whole function in a way that mimics functions of the human brain, and can be trained like any other ML algorithm.^{[citation needed]}

For example, a DNN that is trained to recognize dog breeds will go over the given image and calculate the probability that the dog in the image is a certain breed. The user can review the results and select which probabilities the network should display (above a certain threshold, etc.) and return the proposed label. Each mathematical manipulation as such is considered a layer,^[154] and complex DNN have many layers, hence the name "deep" networks.

DNNs can model complex non-linear relationships. DNN architectures generate compositional models where the object is expressed as a layered composition of primitives.^[155] The extra layers enable composition of features from lower layers, potentially modeling complex data with fewer units than a similarly performing shallow network.^[7] For instance, it was proved that sparse multivariate polynomials are exponentially easier to approximate with DNNs than with shallow networks.^[156]

Deep architectures include many variants of a few basic approaches. Each architecture has found success in specific domains. It is not always possible to compare the performance of multiple architectures, unless they have been evaluated on the same data sets.^[154]

DNNs are typically feedforward networks in which data flows from the input layer to the output layer without looping back. At first, the DNN creates a map of virtual neurons and assigns random numerical values, or "weights", to connections between them. The weights and inputs are multiplied and return an output between 0 and 1. If the network did not accurately recognize a particular pattern, an algorithm would adjust the weights.^[157] That way the algorithm can make certain parameters more influential, until it determines the correct mathematical manipulation to fully process the data.

Recurrent neural networks, in which data can flow in any direction, are used for applications such as language modeling.^{[158][159][160][161][162]} Long short-term memory is particularly effective for this use.^[163][164]

Convolutional neural networks (CNNs) are used in computer vision.^[165] CNNs also have been applied to acoustic modeling for automatic speech recognition (ASR).^[166]

Automatic speech recognition

Large-scale automatic speech recognition is the first and most convincing successful case of deep learning. LSTM RNNs can learn "Very Deep Learning" tasks^[9] that involve multi-second intervals containing speech events separated by thousands of discrete time steps, where one time step corresponds to about 10 ms. LSTM with forget gates^[164] is competitive with traditional speech recognizers on certain tasks.^[102]

The initial success in speech recognition was based on small-scale recognition tasks based on TIMIT. The data set contains 630 speakers from eight major dialects of American English, where each speaker reads 10 sentences.^[186] Its small size lets many configurations be tried. More importantly, the TIMIT task concerns phone-sequence recognition, which, unlike word-sequence recognition, allows weak phone bigram language models. This lets the strength of the acoustic modeling aspects of speech recognition be more easily analyzed. The error rates listed below, including these early results and measured as percent phone error rates (PER), have been summarized since 1991.

The debut of DNNs for speaker recognition in the late 1990s and speech recognition around 2009-2011 and of LSTM around 2003–2007, accelerated progress in eight major areas:^{[23][115][113]}

• Scale-up/out and accelerated DNN training and decoding
• Sequence discriminative training
• Feature processing by deep models with solid understanding of the underlying mechanisms
• Adaptation of DNNs and related deep models
• Multi-task and transfer learning by DNNs and related deep models
• CNNs and how to design them to best exploit domain knowledge of speech
• RNN and its rich LSTM variants
• Other types of deep models including tensor-based models and integrated deep generative/discriminative models.

More recent speech recognition models use Transformers or Temporal Convolution Networks with significant success and widespread applications.^{[191][192][193]} All major commercial speech recognition systems (e.g., Microsoft Cortana, Xbox, Skype Translator, Amazon Alexa, Google Now, Apple Siri, Baidu and iFlyTek voice search, and a range of Nuance speech products, etc.) are based on deep learning.^{[23][194][195]}

Image recognition

A common evaluation set for image classification is the MNIST database data set. MNIST is composed of handwritten digits and includes 60,000 training examples and 10,000 test examples. As with TIMIT, its small size lets users test multiple configurations. A comprehensive list of results on this set is available.^[196]

Deep learning-based image recognition has become "superhuman", producing more accurate results than human contestants. This first occurred in 2011 in recognition of traffic signs, and in 2014, with recognition of human faces.^[197][198]

Deep learning-trained vehicles now interpret 360° camera views.^[199] Another example is Facial Dysmorphology Novel Analysis (FDNA) used to analyze cases of human malformation connected to a large database of genetic syndromes.

Visual art processing

Closely related to the progress that has been made in image recognition is the increasing application of deep learning techniques to various visual art tasks. DNNs have proven themselves capable, for example, of

• identifying the style period of a given painting^[200][201]
• Neural Style Transfer – capturing the style of a given artwork and applying it in a visually pleasing manner to an arbitrary photograph or video^[200][201]
• generating striking imagery based on random visual input fields.^[200][201]

Natural language processing

Neural networks have been used for implementing language models since the early 2000s.^[158] LSTM helped to improve machine translation and language modeling.^{[159][160][161]}

Other key techniques in this field are negative sampling^[202] and word embedding. Word embedding, such as word2vec, can be thought of as a representational layer in a deep learning architecture that transforms an atomic word into a positional representation of the word relative to other words in the dataset; the position is represented as a point in a vector space. Using word embedding as an RNN input layer allows the network to parse sentences and phrases using an effective compositional vector grammar. A compositional vector grammar can be thought of as probabilistic context free grammar (PCFG) implemented by an RNN.^[203] Recursive auto-encoders built atop word embeddings can assess sentence similarity and detect paraphrasing.^[203] Deep neural architectures provide the best results for constituency parsing,^[204] sentiment analysis,^[205] information retrieval,^[206][207] spoken language understanding,^[208] machine translation,^[159][209] contextual entity linking,^[209] writing style recognition,^[210] named-entity recognition (token classification),^[211] text classification, and others.^[212]

Recent developments generalize word embedding to sentence embedding.

Google Translate (GT) uses a large end-to-end long short-term memory (LSTM) network.^{[213][214][215][216]} Google Neural Machine Translation (GNMT) uses an example-based machine translation method in which the system "learns from millions of examples".^[214] It translates "whole sentences at a time, rather than pieces". Google Translate supports over one hundred languages.^[214] The network encodes the "semantics of the sentence rather than simply memorizing phrase-to-phrase translations".^[214][217] GT uses English as an intermediate between most language pairs.^[217]

Drug discovery and toxicology

A large percentage of candidate drugs fail to win regulatory approval. These failures are caused by insufficient efficacy (on-target effect), undesired interactions (off-target effects), or unanticipated toxic effects.^[218][219] Research has explored use of deep learning to predict the biomolecular targets,^[220][221] off-targets, and toxic effects of environmental chemicals in nutrients, household products and drugs.^{[222][223][224]}

AtomNet is a deep learning system for structure-based rational drug design.^[225] AtomNet was used to predict novel candidate biomolecules for disease targets such as the Ebola virus^[226] and multiple sclerosis.^[227][226]

In 2017 graph neural networks were used for the first time to predict various properties of molecules in a large toxicology data set.^[228] In 2019, generative neural networks were used to produce molecules that were validated experimentally all the way into mice.^[229][230]

Recommendation systems

Recommendation systems have used deep learning to extract meaningful features for a latent factor model for content-based music and journal recommendations.^[231][232] Multi-view deep learning has been applied for learning user preferences from multiple domains.^[233] The model uses a hybrid collaborative and content-based approach and enhances recommendations in multiple tasks.

Bioinformatics

An autoencoder ANN was used in bioinformatics, to predict gene ontology annotations and gene-function relationships.^[234]

In medical informatics, deep learning was used to predict sleep quality based on data from wearables^[235] and predictions of health complications from electronic health record data.^[236]

Deep neural networks have shown unparalleled performance in predicting protein structure, according to the sequence of the amino acids that make it up. In 2020, AlphaFold, a deep-learning based system, achieved a level of accuracy significantly higher than all previous computational methods.^[237][238]

Deep Neural Network Estimations

Deep neural networks can be used to estimate the entropy of a stochastic process through an arrangement called a Neural Joint Entropy Estimator (NJEE).^[239] Such an estimation provides insights on the effects of input random variables on an independent random variable. Practically, the DNN is trained as a classifier that maps an input vector or matrix X to an output probability distribution over the possible classes of random variable Y, given input X. For example, in image classification tasks, the NJEE maps a vector of pixels' color values to probabilities over possible image classes. In practice, the probability distribution of Y is obtained by a Softmax layer with number of nodes that is equal to the alphabet size of Y. NJEE uses continuously differentiable activation functions, such that the conditions for the universal approximation theorem holds. It is shown that this method provides a strongly consistent estimator and outperforms other methods in cases of large alphabet sizes.^[239]

Medical image analysis

Deep learning has been shown to produce competitive results in medical applications such as cancer cell classification, lesion detection, organ segmentation and image enhancement.^[240][241] Modern deep learning tools demonstrate the high accuracy of detecting various diseases and the helpfulness of their use by specialists to improve the diagnosis efficiency.^[242][243]

Mobile advertising

Finding the appropriate mobile audience for mobile advertising is always challenging, since many data points must be considered and analyzed before a target segment can be created and used in ad serving by any ad server.^[244] Deep learning has been used to interpret large, many-dimensioned advertising datasets. Many data points are collected during the request/serve/click internet advertising cycle. This information can form the basis of machine learning to improve ad selection.

Image restoration

Deep learning has been successfully applied to inverse problems such as denoising, super-resolution, inpainting, and film colorization.^[245] These applications include learning methods such as "Shrinkage Fields for Effective Image Restoration"^[246] which trains on an image dataset, and Deep Image Prior, which trains on the image that needs restoration.

Financial fraud detection

Deep learning is being applied to financial fraud detection, tax evasion detection,^[247] and anti-money laundering.^[248]

Materials science

In November 2023, researchers at Google DeepMind and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory announced that they had developed an AI system known as GNoME. This system has contributed to materials science by discovering over 2 million new materials within a relatively short timeframe. GNoME employs deep learning techniques to efficiently explore potential material structures, achieving a significant increase in the identification of stable inorganic crystal structures. The system's predictions were validated through autonomous robotic experiments, demonstrating a noteworthy success rate of 71%. The data of newly discovered materials is publicly available through the Materials Project database, offering researchers the opportunity to identify materials with desired properties for various applications. This development has implications for the future of scientific discovery and the integration of AI in material science research, potentially expediting material innovation and reducing costs in product development. The use of AI and deep learning suggests the possibility of minimizing or eliminating manual lab experiments and allowing scientists to focus more on the design and analysis of unique compounds.^{[249][250][251]}

Military

The United States Department of Defense applied deep learning to train robots in new tasks through observation.^[252]

Partial differential equations

Physics-informed neural networks have been used to solve partial differential equations in both forward and inverse problems in a data driven manner.^[253] One example is the reconstructing fluid flow governed by the Navier-Stokes equations. Using physics informed neural networks does not require the often expensive mesh generation that conventional CFD methods rely on.^[254][255] It is evident that geometric and physical constraints have a synergistic effect on neural PDE surrogates, thereby enhancing their efficacy in predicting stable and super long rollouts.^[256]

Deep backward stochastic differential equation method

Deep backward stochastic differential equation method is a numerical method that combines deep learning with Backward stochastic differential equation (BSDE). This method is particularly useful for solving high-dimensional problems in financial mathematics. By leveraging the powerful function approximation capabilities of deep neural networks, deep BSDE addresses the computational challenges faced by traditional numerical methods in high-dimensional settings. Specifically, traditional methods like finite difference methods or Monte Carlo simulations often struggle with the curse of dimensionality, where computational cost increases exponentially with the number of dimensions. Deep BSDE methods, however, employ deep neural networks to approximate solutions of high-dimensional partial differential equations (PDEs), effectively reducing the computational burden.^[257]

In addition, the integration of Physics-informed neural networks (PINNs) into the deep BSDE framework enhances its capability by embedding the underlying physical laws directly into the neural network architecture. This ensures that the solutions not only fit the data but also adhere to the governing stochastic differential equations. PINNs leverage the power of deep learning while respecting the constraints imposed by the physical models, resulting in more accurate and reliable solutions for financial mathematics problems.

Image reconstruction

Image reconstruction is the reconstruction of the underlying images from the image-related measurements. Several works showed the better and superior performance of the deep learning methods compared to analytical methods for various applications, e.g., spectral imaging ^[258] and ultrasound imaging.^[259]

Weather prediction

Traditional weather prediction systems typically solve a complex system of partial differential equations. GraphCast is a deep learning-based model trained on a long history of weather data to predict how weather patterns change over time. It can predict weather conditions for up to 10 days globally, at a very detailed level, and in under a minute, with precision similar to state of the art systems.^[260][261]

Epigenetic clock

An epigenetic clock is a biochemical test that can be used to measure age. Galkin et al. used deep neural networks to train an epigenetic aging clock of unprecedented accuracy using >6,000 blood samples.^[262] The clock uses information from 1000 CpG sites and predicts people with certain conditions older than healthy controls: IBD, frontotemporal dementia, ovarian cancer, obesity. The aging clock was planned to be released for public use in 2021 by an Insilico Medicine spinoff company Deep Longevity.

Theory

A main criticism concerns the lack of theory surrounding some methods.^[285] Learning in the most common deep architectures is implemented using well-understood gradient descent. However, the theory surrounding other algorithms, such as contrastive divergence is less clear.^{[citation needed]} (e.g., Does it converge? If so, how fast? What is it approximating?) Deep learning methods are often looked at as a black box, with most confirmations done empirically, rather than theoretically.^[286]

In further reference to the idea that artistic sensitivity might be inherent in relatively low levels of the cognitive hierarchy, a published series of graphic representations of the internal states of deep (20-30 layers) neural networks attempting to discern within essentially random data the images on which they were trained^[287] demonstrate a visual appeal: the original research notice received well over 1,000 comments, and was the subject of what was for a time the most frequently accessed article on The Guardian's^[288] website.

With the support of Innovation Diffusion Theory (IDT), a study analyzed the diffusion of deep learning in BRICS and OECD countries using data from Google Trends.^[289]

Errors

Some deep learning architectures display problematic behaviors,^[290] such as confidently classifying unrecognizable images as belonging to a familiar category of ordinary images (2014)^[291] and misclassifying minuscule perturbations of correctly classified images (2013).^[292] Goertzel hypothesized that these behaviors are due to limitations in their internal representations and that these limitations would inhibit integration into heterogeneous multi-component artificial general intelligence (AGI) architectures.^[290] These issues may possibly be addressed by deep learning architectures that internally form states homologous to image-grammar^[293] decompositions of observed entities and events.^[290] Learning a grammar (visual or linguistic) from training data would be equivalent to restricting the system to commonsense reasoning that operates on concepts in terms of grammatical production rules and is a basic goal of both human language acquisition^[294] and artificial intelligence (AI).^[295]

Cyber threat

As deep learning moves from the lab into the world, research and experience show that artificial neural networks are vulnerable to hacks and deception.^[296] By identifying patterns that these systems use to function, attackers can modify inputs to ANNs in such a way that the ANN finds a match that human observers would not recognize. For example, an attacker can make subtle changes to an image such that the ANN finds a match even though the image looks to a human nothing like the search target. Such manipulation is termed an "adversarial attack".^[297]

In 2016 researchers used one ANN to doctor images in trial and error fashion, identify another's focal points, and thereby generate images that deceived it. The modified images looked no different to human eyes. Another group showed that printouts of doctored images then photographed successfully tricked an image classification system.^[298] One defense is reverse image search, in which a possible fake image is submitted to a site such as TinEye that can then find other instances of it. A refinement is to search using only parts of the image, to identify images from which that piece may have been taken.^[299]

Another group showed that certain psychedelic spectacles could fool a facial recognition system into thinking ordinary people were celebrities, potentially allowing one person to impersonate another. In 2017 researchers added stickers to stop signs and caused an ANN to misclassify them.^[298]

ANNs can however be further trained to detect attempts at deception, potentially leading attackers and defenders into an arms race similar to the kind that already defines the malware defense industry. ANNs have been trained to defeat ANN-based anti-malware software by repeatedly attacking a defense with malware that was continually altered by a genetic algorithm until it tricked the anti-malware while retaining its ability to damage the target.^[298]

In 2016, another group demonstrated that certain sounds could make the Google Now voice command system open a particular web address, and hypothesized that this could "serve as a stepping stone for further attacks (e.g., opening a web page hosting drive-by malware)".^[298]

In "data poisoning", false data is continually smuggled into a machine learning system's training set to prevent it from achieving mastery.^[298]

Data collection ethics

The deep learning systems that are trained using supervised learning often rely on data that is created or annotated by humans, or both.^[300] It has been argued that not only low-paid clickwork (such as on Amazon Mechanical Turk) is regularly deployed for this purpose, but also implicit forms of human microwork that are often not recognized as such.^[301] The philosopher Rainer Mühlhoff distinguishes five types of "machinic capture" of human microwork to generate training data: (1) gamification (the embedding of annotation or computation tasks in the flow of a game), (2) "trapping and tracking" (e.g. CAPTCHAs for image recognition or click-tracking on Google search results pages), (3) exploitation of social motivations (e.g. tagging faces on Facebook to obtain labeled facial images), (4) information mining (e.g. by leveraging quantified-self devices such as activity trackers) and (5) clickwork.^[301]